Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Latest
  • Issues
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • About
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board
    • About IIJ
  • Information for
    • Advertisers and Sponsors
    • Agents
    • Authors
    • Institutions
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Institutional Investor Journals: Home
    • The Journal of Alternative Investments
    • The Journal of Derivatives
    • The Journal of Fixed Income
    • The Journal of Index Investing
    • The Journal of Investing
    • The Journal of Private Equity
    • The Journal of Retirement
    • The Journal of Structured Finance
    • The Journal of Trading
    • The Journal of Wealth Management
    • Practical Applications
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
  • Visit IIJ on Facebook

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Portfolio Management
  • Institutional Investor Journals: Home
    • The Journal of Alternative Investments
    • The Journal of Derivatives
    • The Journal of Fixed Income
    • The Journal of Index Investing
    • The Journal of Investing
    • The Journal of Private Equity
    • The Journal of Retirement
    • The Journal of Structured Finance
    • The Journal of Trading
    • The Journal of Wealth Management
    • Practical Applications
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
The Journal of Portfolio Management

The Journal of Portfolio Management

Advanced Search

  • Latest
  • Issues
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • About
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board
    • About IIJ
  • Information for
    • Advertisers and Sponsors
    • Agents
    • Authors
    • Institutions
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
  • Visit IIJ on Facebook
Article

A CVaR Scenario-Based Framework for Minimizing Downside Risk in Multi-Asset Class Portfolios

Kartik Sivaramakrishnan and Robert Stamicar
The Journal of Portfolio Management Multi-Asset Special Issue 2018, 44 (2) 114-129; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2018.44.2.114
Kartik Sivaramakrishnan
is a director of research at Axioma, Inc., in Atlanta, GA. kksivara@axioma.com
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Stamicar
is a senior director of Risk Management at Axioma, Inc., in New York, NY. rstamicar@axioma.com
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

Multi-asset class (MAC) portfolios can be composed of investments in equities, fixed income, commodities, foreign exchange, credit, derivatives, and alternatives such as real estate and private equity. The return for such nonlinear portfolios is asymmetric with significant tail risk. The traditional Markowitz mean–variance optimization (MVO) framework, which linearizes all the assets in the portfolio and uses the standard deviation of return as a measure of risk, does not always accurately measure the risk for such portfolios. The authors consider a scenario-based conditional value at risk (CVaR) approach for minimizing the downside risk of an existing portfolio with MAC overlays. The approach consists of two phases: Phase 1 uses Monte-Carlo simulations to generate the asset return scenarios, and Phase 2 incorporates the return scenarios in a scenario-based convex optimization model to generate the overlay holdings. The authors illustrate the methodology in two examples involving the hedging of an equity portfolio with index puts and the hedging of a callable bond portfolio with interest rate caps. They compare the CVaR approach with parametric MVO approaches that linearize all the instruments in the MAC portfolio and show that the CVaR approach generates portfolios with better downside risk statistics; and further, it selects hedges that produce more attractive risk decompositions and stress test numbers—tools commonly used by risk managers to evaluate the quality of hedges.

  • © 2018 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Portfolio Management: 44 (2)
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Vol. 44, Issue 2
Multi-Asset Special Issue 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Portfolio Management.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A CVaR Scenario-Based Framework for Minimizing Downside Risk in Multi-Asset Class Portfolios
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Portfolio Management
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Portfolio Management web site.
Citation Tools
A CVaR Scenario-Based Framework for Minimizing Downside Risk in Multi-Asset Class Portfolios
Kartik Sivaramakrishnan, Robert Stamicar
The Journal of Portfolio Management Dec 2017, 44 (2) 114-129; DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2018.44.2.114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
A CVaR Scenario-Based Framework for Minimizing Downside Risk in Multi-Asset Class Portfolios
Kartik Sivaramakrishnan, Robert Stamicar
The Journal of Portfolio Management Dec 2017, 44 (2) 114-129; DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2018.44.2.114
Permalink:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • DOWNSIDE RISK MEASURES
    • CVAR SCENARIO-BASED FRAMEWORK
    • PHASE 1: MONTE CARLO FRAMEWORK FOR ASSET SCENARIOS
    • CVAR HIERARCHICAL APPROACH
    • SENSITIVITY OF CVAR OPTIMIZATION TO NUMBER OF SAMPLES
    • EXAMPLE 1: HEDGING AN EQUITY PORTFOLIO WITH INDEX PUTS
    • EXAMPLE 2: HEDGING CALLABLE BONDS WITH IR CAPS
    • CONCLUSION
    • ENDNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Buyback Derangement Syndrome
  • Mimicking Portfolios
  • On the Benefits of Centralized Portfolio Management
Show more Article

Similar Articles

II Journals
1120 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
  • Visit IIJ on Facebook

ABOUT US

  • Home
  • About IIJ
  • Nobel Laureates
  • Events
  • Awards
  • Careers

OUR OFFERINGS

  • IIJ Investment Guides
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Digital Archives

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise or sponsor
  • Publish your work
  • Subscribe
  • Agents

CUSTOMER SERVICE

  • Contact Us
  • FAQ's
  • Feedback
  • Publishing Schedule 2017/2018
  • Code of Ethics
  • Content Usage Terms - Subscriptions and Trials
  • Subscribe Now
  • Sign In
  • Email Subscriptions

© 2018 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 0095-4918 | E-ISSN: 2168-8656

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies